= Rotating bob experiment for a conical pendulum
The motivating observation is a bob going around at almost constant height while its string traces a cone. The University of Iowa's demonstration places a camera above a short pendulum to reveal this motion. https://instructional-resources.physics.uiowa.edu/1d5025-conical-pendulum[University of Iowa, demonstration 1D50.25: short pendulum and overhead camera]{ref} The following proposed measurement procedure develops that observation into a test of the <conical pendulum> model; it is not a report of collected data.
Suspend a compact bob from a rigid, fixed support using a light string, and measure $\ell$ from the pivot to the bob's centre. Put a stationary marker beside the orbit as a timing reference. Displace the bob sideways and give it a horizontal push tangent to the intended circle, then let go. For a chosen starting <angle> $\theta$, the predicted initial <speed> is $v=\sqrt{g\ell\sin^2\theta/\cos\theta}$. Adjust the launch between trials until a short observation interval has nearly constant orbit radius and height. Keep the pivot fixed while recording: circling the support by hand changes the problem, and a maintained drive would introduce another <force>.
Record from above with the camera looking approximately along the vertical axis. Check that the bob's centre follows a circle and that successive returns to the marker take nearly equal times. A separate side recording checks whether the bob's height stays constant. A markedly elliptical orbit or visibly rising and falling bob is not the uniform <circular motion> assumed by the <conical pendulum> equations. Measure the orbit diameter with a scale at the orbit's height; in a level side view, use the two extreme horizontal positions, not one arbitrary frame. Halve the diameter to obtain $r$, or measure the vertical drop $h$ directly in a calibrated side view. An oblique camera view and a scale at a different depth distort apparent lengths, so arrange the geometry before interpreting the images.
Time $N$ complete returns to the same marker in the same direction and estimate $P=\Delta t/N$. Counting ten revolutions, when the orbit stays sufficiently steady, spreads an endpoint timing error over ten periods. Repeat the timing and compare the first and last few revolutions to detect drift; using a longer interval helps only if the motion remains close to uniform. From independently measured geometry, compute $\sin\theta=r/\ell$ or $\cos\theta=h/\ell$, and check $r^2+h^2\simeq\ell^2$ if both were measured. Then compare the measured <oscillation period> with $P^2=4\pi^2h/g$. MIT's 8.01X experimental assignment explicitly asks students to compare the <conical pendulum>'s period, length, and orbit radius with theory. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-01x-physics-i-classical-mechanics-with-an-experimental-focus-fall-2002/a056f6a3e071767d4f7620bca6a59d0c_expt_vs_problem.pdf[MIT 8.01X, Fall 2002, Vibrating Systems experimental problem, question 8]{ref}
Repeat at several launch radii with the same $\ell$. Larger $r$ means smaller $h=\sqrt{\ell^2-r^2}$, so the ideal <oscillation period> decreases. A plot of measured $P^2$ against independently measured $h$ should follow a straight line through the origin with slope $4\pi^2/g$; conversely, $g=4\pi^2h/P^2$ estimates <gravitational acceleration>. Do not infer $h$ from the timing equation and then use that same equation as a test. Compare discrepancies with the spread of repeated timings and the resolution of the length measurements. String stretch, a moving pivot, and appreciable bob size challenge the stated geometry; <drag force> and pivot <friction> challenge the assumption of undriven uniform motion. Observe a short interval and record any shrinking or drifting orbit rather than silently treating it as an exact <conical pendulum>.
For an illustrative calculation, assume $\ell=1.00\,\mathrm m$, $m=0.050\,\mathrm{kg}$, $g=9.81\,\mathrm{m/s^2}$, and $\theta=40^\circ$. The model gives $r\approx0.643\,\mathrm m$, $h\approx0.766\,\mathrm m$, $P\approx1.756\,\mathrm s$, $v\approx2.300\,\mathrm{m/s}$, and $T\approx0.640\,\mathrm N$. Its vertical <tension> component is $0.4905\,\mathrm N$, equal to the <gravitational weight>; its inward component is approximately $0.412\,\mathrm N$. These are predictions from chosen parameters, not measured data or measurements of local $g$. The next figure uses the same stipulated $\ell$ and $g$, including illustrative <angles> $15^\circ$, $40^\circ$, and $60^\circ$.
Back to article page
