= Shared-excitation resistance ratio measurement
A <shared-excitation resistance ratio measurement> compares two <electrical resistances> by passing the same <electric current> through them and comparing their <electric potential differences>. It is the circuit realization of a <ratiometric measurement>: the unknown excitation becomes a common multiplicative input.
For a sensor $R_T$ in series with a <reference resistor> $R_{\rm ref}$, ideal high-input-impedance sensing gives
$$
V_T=IR_T,\qquad V_{\rm ref}=IR_{\rm ref},\qquad
r=\frac{V_T}{V_{\rm ref}}=\frac{R_T}{R_{\rm ref}}.
$$
The <electric current> must be nonzero and shared at the time relevant to each sample. One implementation feeds $V_T$ to an <analog-to-digital converter> input and $V_{\rm ref}$ to its external reference pins; the conversion is then scaled by their <ratio>. The primary circuit guide shows this wiring and includes the programmed gain when translating a digital code to resistance.<A Basic Guide to RTD Measurements by Joseph Wu>[§§2.1.1 and 2.1.4, printed pp. 10–11, Figure 2-1 and equations (17)–(18)]{ref}
For an original check, choose $R_T=180\,\Omega$ and $R_{\rm ref}=1200\,\Omega$. Excitation at $0.4\,\mathrm{mA}$ gives $0.072\,\mathrm V$ and $0.480\,\mathrm V$; excitation at $1.2\,\mathrm{mA}$ gives $0.216\,\mathrm V$ and $1.440\,\mathrm V$. Both give $r=0.15$ and recover $180\,\Omega$. This calculation assumes unchanged resistances; the larger excitation dissipates nine times the sensor <electric power>, making <sensor self-heating in a ratiometric resistance measurement> an independent test.
A common supply is insufficient if different branch currents pass through the two resistances. With currents $I_T,I_{\rm ref}$,
$$
r=\frac{I_T}{I_{\rm ref}}\frac{R_T}{R_{\rm ref}}.
$$
This is <branch-current mismatch in a resistance ratio measurement>. Sequential sampling of a changing excitation has the same problem unless the two paths retain the same effective excitation history. <Ratiometric cancellation with matched signal and reference filters> specifies the dynamic condition.
Wiring matters even with an ideal shared <current source>. A two-wire sensor reading includes lead <electrical resistance>; <four-terminal sensing> separates the current leads from high-impedance potential-sensing leads. The reference itself needs the same care if lead drops would otherwise enter its measured denominator.<A Basic Guide to RTD Measurements by Joseph Wu>[§2.1.3, printed p. 11, Kelvin reference connection and two-wire lead error]{ref}
A bench check can replace the sensor with a stable known <resistor>, sweep excitation, and compare each measured potential with their <ratio>. A constant <ratio> accompanied by changing individual potentials tests shared excitation. It does not establish reference accuracy, eliminate sensor heating, or prove operation outside the converter's input and reference ranges.
Back to article page