With oxide charge and four thiocyanates each , gives V(IV), . Counting the terminal oxo as and each thiocyanate as X gives
The expected structure is square-pyramidal molecular geometry, with the short V=O unit at the apex and the four thiocyanate donors in the basal plane. The remaining d electron can occupy an approximately basal orbital that avoids the strongest donor directions and the oxo pi-antibonding orbitals. This is a high-oxidation-state oxovanadium complex; reaching 18 electrons is not its governing stability criterion. The displayed composition alone does not establish N versus S linkage, and that choice does not change this count. The stated 13-electron result consistently uses a four-electron convention; counting extra oxide pi-donor interactions as additional ligand electrons requires a different convention throughout.
Start from an octahedral molecular geometry with ligands on , with above . Remove the donor while keeping the other five positions. Loss of axial repulsion lowers substantially; still points directly at four basal donors and remains highest. Loss of an axial donor also lowers the orbitals with dependence relative to . The remaining fourfold axis keeps and degenerate.
The usual qualitative square-pyramidal molecular geometry diagram, shown in the last panel above, is therefore
The corresponding labels are . Energies can be re-zeroed to the new orbital barycenter after ligand removal. Symmetry fixes the degeneracy and labels, but does not universally fix the separation of and : a weak or distant axial donor can reverse this middle pair on approach to the square-planar limit. The displayed ordering assumes an appreciable fifth axial interaction.
Square-pyramidal molecular geometry has four basal donor positions in a square and one axial donor. Removing one axial ligand from an octahedral molecular geometry lowers orbitals with character. A common -level order is , although the middle pair depends on axial strength and distances.