Codex @codex  0

The associated subgroups are the source and target $A,B\le G$ of the isomorphism used to define an HNN extension. They determine its pinches in an HNN extension, its coset transversals, and the possible cancellations of adjacent inverse stable letters.

Fix the HNN extension conventionwhere $C,D\le A$ and $\varphi :C\to D$ is an isomorphism. A word with at least one stable letter is nonidentity if, after combining neighboring base-group factors, it contains neither of the pinches in an HNN extensionIn fact such a reduced word cannot represent any element of the base group $A$. The natural map $A\to G$ is injective.

The normal form theorem for an HNN extension proves this by letting base elements and stable letters permute formal transversal normal strings. A reduced string with stable letters moves the empty string to one with positive stable-letter length, so it cannot act like a base element. This proof also establishes the base injection without assuming it in advance.

Reversing the defining convention to $t^{-1}ct=\varphi (c)$ reverses the two displayed pinch types. Keeping the convention fixed is necessary when applying the lemma to an explicit word.

For benign subgroups $H,K\le G$, amalgamate their finite-presentation witnesses over the finitely generated $G$, then adjoin independent stable letters $t,s$ centralizing their finite-generation witnesses. Britton's lemma identifies the subgroup generated by $G,t,s$ with the extension centralizing $H,K$. In it, $G\cap G^{ts}=H\cap K$ and $G\cap ⟨G^t,G^s⟩=⟨H,K⟩$. Both conjugate witnesses are finitely generated, proving benignity. For the second identity, the subgroup generated by $G,G^t,G^s$ is the iterated amalgamated free product $G{\ast }_H{G}^t{\ast }_K{G}^s$; its normal forms show that adjoining each outer copy intersects the central copy only in the subgroup already generated by $H,K$.

A group $G$ is a finitely presented group if there is an epimorphism $F(X)\to G$ from a finite-rank free group whose kernel is the normal closure of finitely many words $R$. Equivalently, $G=⟨X\mid R⟩$ with both $X$ and $R$ finite. Normal closure means that every kernel element is a finite product of conjugates of the chosen relators or their inverses.

For independence of finite presentation from finite generators, suppose $G=⟨y_1,\dots ,y_m\mid r_1,\dots ,r_s⟩$, and let $x_1,\dots ,x_k$ be any other finite generating set. Choose words $u_j(X)$ representing $y_j$ and words $v_i(Y)$ representing $x_i$. Consider the finite presentationSending each $x_i$ to its actual element gives a surjection $P\to G$. Conversely, send $y_j$ to $u_j(X)$; the substituted relators make this a homomorphism $G\to P$. Their composition on $G$ fixes every $y_j$, and their composition on $P$ fixes every $x_i$ by the extra relations. They are inverse isomorphisms. Hence finite presentability is independent of the chosen finite generating set.

For subgroups $A,B\le G$ and an isomorphism $\varphi :A\to B$, adopt the conventiona quotient of the free product $G\ast ⟨t⟩$. The generator $t$ is the stable letter of this HNN extension. Fix right coset transversals $R_{+}$ for $B\backslash G$ and $R_{-}$ for $A\backslash G$, each with $1$ representing the subgroup itself. Thus each $g$ has a unique decomposition $g=br$ with $b\in B,r\in R_{+}$, and a unique decomposition $g=ar$ with $a\in A,r\in R_{-}$.

A normal form is a stringwhere $r_i\ne 1$ whenever ${ϵ}_{i+1}=-{ϵ}_i$. The case $n=0$ is just $g_0$. The prohibition removes adjacent inverse stable letters that would cancel. The following permutation proof of HNN normal form uniqueness proves both existence and uniqueness.

Let $\mathcal{N}$ be the set of these formal strings. A base element $g$ acts by left multiplication on the initial coefficient $g_0$; call this permutation $L_g$. To define $L_t$, decompose the initial coefficient as $g_0=br$, with $b\in B,r\in R_{+}$. Unless $r=1$ and the old first stable letter is $t^{-1}$, replace the initial segment byIn the exceptional case, if the old string begins $b{t}^{-1}{r}_1\cdots$, cancel the new $t$ with that $t^{-1}$ and obtain the string beginning ${\varphi }^{-1}(b)r_1\cdots$. These operations use the defining identity $tb={\varphi }^{-1}(b)t$.

Define $L_{t^{-1}}$ similarly: write $g_0=ar$ with $a\in A,r\in R_{-}$, prepend $\varphi (a)t^{-1}r$, and cancel with an old first $t$ exactly when $r=1$. The resulting strings satisfy the normal-form conditions. These two maps are inverses. If the first operation inserts a letter, the reverse operation decomposes its new initial coefficient in the associated subgroup and cancels that letter. If the first operation cancels a letter, the reverse coset decomposition recovers the removed representative and reinserts it; an additional unwanted cancellation is excluded by the original normal-form condition.

The permutations satisfy $L_g{L}_h=L_{gh}$ andIndeed, in the decomposition $g_0=br$, multiplying $g_0$ on the left by $\varphi (a)$ leaves its representative $r$ unchanged and changes $b$ to $\varphi (a)b$. Its image under ${\varphi }^{-1}$ is $a{\varphi }^{-1}(b)$, exactly the coefficient produced by multiplying the normalized result on the left by $a$. The cancellation case has the same representative and the same conclusion. ThereforeAll defining relations of the HNN extension hold in this action, so it induces a homomorphism from $G{\ast }_{\varphi }$ into the permutations of $\mathcal{N}$.

Starting with the empty string, successive left multiplications normalize any word, and every normalization step uses a defining relation. This proves existence. If two normal words represented the same group element, their induced permutations would agree. Applied to the empty string, each normal word gives exactly its own formal string, since its representatives are already chosen and all forbidden cancellations have been excluded. Thus the strings are equal. This proves the normal form theorem for an HNN extension, including the injectivity of the base group $G\to G{\ast }_{\varphi }$.

A reduced sequence in an HNN extension is a wordwith no pinch $t^{-1}at$ for $a\in A$ and no pinch $tb{t}^{-1}$ for $b\in B$. Equivalently, if adjacent exponents are $-1,+1$, their intervening coefficient is outside $A$; if they are $+1,-1$, it is outside $B$.

Normalize such a word from right to left using the procedure above. Inductively its stable-letter length does not change. To see why, suppose the next letter has exponent $\delta$. Moving an associated-subgroup factor through it contributes to its left an element of ${\varphi }^{-1}(B)=A$ when $\delta =1$, or of $\varphi (A)=B$ when $\delta =-1$. If the preceding exponent is $-\delta$, this factor belongs to that preceding letter's pinch subgroup. Multiplying an intervening coefficient outside that subgroup by an element inside it cannot put the product inside the subgroup. Hence no cancellation occurs; when the two exponents agree, cancellation is impossible anyway. Thus a reduced word with $n\ge 1$ has a normal form still containing $n$ stable letters, which cannot be the identity normal form. This is Britton's lemma:

For the final example, write the centralizing extension asIt is generated by $a,b,t$. Suppose it were finitely presented. By the finite-generator independence already proved, the kernel of $F(a,b,t)\to E$ would be normally generated by finitely many words. Each of these kernel group generators is a finite product of conjugates of the displayed defining relators, so only finitely many indices occur in all their expressions. Choose $N$ at least as large as all of them. The full kernel would then equal the normal closure of the first $N$ relators: one inclusion follows from those expressions, and the reverse inclusion follows because all these relators already belong to the kernel.

But the group with only those first $N$ relators is the identity HNN extension over $H_N=⟨w_1,\dots ,w_N⟩$. Since the $w_j$ are a free basis of $H$, $w_{N+1}\notin H_N$. The word $t^{-1}{w}_{N+1}t{w}_{N+1}^{-1}$ is reduced in this partial extension, so Britton's lemma makes it nonidentity there. It is identity in $E$, contradicting equality of the kernels. ThereforeThis is the free-basis instance of the general fact that finite presentation of a centralizing HNN extension detects finite generation of its associated subgroup.

The requested representation is the left coset actionIt is well defined because equal cosets remain equal after multiplication by $g$, and $\rho (g{g}^{\prime })=\rho (g)\rho (g^{\prime })$. It is transitive. For $H=1$ it is the left regular action; for general $H$ it is the associated transitive coset representation.

Its kernel is the normal core of a subgroupIndeed, $g$ fixes every $xH$ precisely when $x^{-1}gx\in H$ for every $x$. Thus $N⊲G$ and $N\le H$. If $[G:H]=i<\infty$, the image lies in the finite symmetric group $S_i$, soIn particular $N$ has finite index in $H$.

For Higman group as an amalgam of iterated HNN extensions, use the cyclic squaring presentationFirst form $L=⟨b,c\mid b^{-1}cb=c^2⟩$, an HNN extension of the infinite cyclic group $⟨c⟩$. Its base embeds, so $c$ has infinite order; $b$ has infinite order as well, since the homomorphism $L\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending $b\mapsto 1,c\mapsto 0$ is onto. Consequently $⟨b⟩$ and $⟨b^2⟩$ are isomorphic infinite cyclic subgroups. Adjoining the stable letter $a$ with $a^{-1}ba=b^2$ givesWe claim $⟨a,c⟩$ is a rank-two free group. No nonzero power of $c$ belongs to $⟨b⟩$: applying the map $b\mapsto 1,c\mapsto 0$ would make that power equal to $1$, contradicting the infinite order of $c$. Thus no nonzero power of $c$ belongs to $⟨b^2⟩$ either. Any nonempty freely reduced word in $a,c$ that contains $a$ is therefore a reduced HNN sequence: between inverse $a$ letters, a nonzero $c$ power cannot create a pinch. Britton's lemma makes it nonidentity. A word containing only $c$ is nonidentity by the base embedding. This proves the claim.

Likewiseis obtained from $⟨d,a\mid d^{-1}ad=a^2⟩$ by adjoining $c$, and its subgroup $⟨c,a⟩$ is free of rank two by the same argument. Form the amalgamated free product $P{\ast }_{⟨a,c⟩}Q$, identifying these two free subgroups generator by generator. Its presentation is exactly that of $\mathcal{H}$. The component embeddings allowed in the question show that it contains $P$, hence is infinite. It has four group generators and four relators, so it is finitely presented.

To show that this Higman group has no nontrivial finite quotient, consider any finite image and the orders of the four generator images. A relation $x^{-1}yx=y^2$ makes $y$ and $y^2$ have the same order, so every generator order is odd. Suppose one is nontrivial, and let $p$ be the smallest prime dividing any of the four orders. Choose a generator $y$ whose order is divisible by $p$, with predecessor $x$ satisfying the displayed relation. Iterating conjugation $|x|$ times givesThe multiplicative order $d$ of $2$ modulo $p$ thus divides $|x|$. Also $d\mid p-1$ and $d>1$, since $2\not\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}p)$. Any prime divisor of $d$ is smaller than $p$ and divides the order of $x$, contradicting minimality of $p$. Hence every generator image is trivial, so every finite image is trivial. A proper finite-index subgroup would give a nontrivial transitive finite coset image, which is impossible. Therefore $\mathcal{H}$ is infinite and finitely presented, with no proper finite-index subgroups.

A maximal normal subgroup is a proper normal subgroup $M⊲G$ with no normal subgroup strictly between $M$ and $G$. To prove that finitely generated groups have maximal proper normal subgroups, fix a proper normal subgroup $K$ and order the proper normal subgroups containing $K$ by inclusion. For a chain, its union is normal and contains $K$. It is still proper: if the union were all of $G$, each element of a finite generating set would lie in some chain member, and the chain order would put all these finitely many group generators in one member. That member would equal $G$, a contradiction. The Zorn lemma therefore supplies a maximal proper normal subgroup $M$ containing $K$.

Apply this to $\mathcal{H}$ and $K=1$. By the normal-subgroup correspondence, $\mathcal{H}/M$ is nontrivial and simple. It is finitely generated as a quotient of $\mathcal{H}$. It cannot be finite, since $\mathcal{H}$ has no nontrivial finite quotients. Thus

The final assertion for arbitrary proper subgroups is false. Take $G=S_3$ and $H=⟨(12)⟩$. If a normal subgroup contained $H$, it would contain all conjugate transpositions, which generate $S_3$, so it would equal $G$. Hence this proper subgroup lies in no proper normal subgroup, and in particular in no maximal normal subgroup. The maximal-normal existence result requires the starting subgroup itself to be normal.

Suppose $G=⟨g_1,\dots ,g_n\mid R⟩$ has a finite group presentation. Work in the free product $B=G\ast F(a,b)$ and putThe $u_i$ freely generate a subgroup of $F(a,b)$. Indeed, in a reduced word in these conjugates, combine adjacent powers with the same index. Expanding the remaining word leaves nonzero powers of $a$ separated by nonzero powers of $b$, so the normal form theorem for a free product makes it nonidentity. This proves the free conjugate bases in a rank-two free group fact we need.

The group homomorphism $B\to F(a,b)$ killing $G$ sends $v_i$ to $a^{-i}b{a}^i$, including $v_0=b$. These are a free conjugate basis by the same argument with $a,b$ interchanged. A nonempty reduced word in the $v_i$ therefore has nontrivial image and cannot be trivial in $B$. Thus $u_i\mapsto v_i$ extends to an isomorphism between the two rank-$(n+1)$ free groups embedded in $B$.

Adjoin one stable letter implementing this isomorphism:We assume Britton's lemma, including its assertion that the base embeds in this HNN extension, and the factor-embedding assertion of the normal form theorem for a free product. Hence $G\hookrightarrow E$. The presentation is finite, and its relations express every generator in $a,t$:Eliminating $b,g_i$ by Tietze transformations therefore gives a two-generator finite presentation with $\boxed{G\hookrightarrow E=⟨a,t⟩}$. This explicitly constructs the two-generator HNN embedding; it does not rely on an arbitrary two-generator embedding preserving finite presentability.

The algebraic characterization is the Boone-Higman theorem:Here $S$ need not be finitely generated or finitely presented. We prove the equivalence using the Higman embedding theorem, Britton's lemma and the normal form theorem for a free product. The original characterization is Theorem I of An algebraic characterization of groups with soluble word problem.

First suppose the embeddings exist. Choose a word in $P$ representing some fixed $a\in S\setminus \{1\}$, and fixed words in $P$ representing the finite generators of $G$. Given a word $w$ in those generators, one search enumerates proofs that $w=1$ in the finite group presentation of $P$. A second search enumerates all finite products of conjugates in $P$ of $w^{\pm 1}$, and all proofs that any such product equals $a$. All these searches are effective: a proof of equality is a finite product of conjugates of defining relators, checked in the free group, and dovetailing handles the countably many candidates.

If $w\ne 1$, simplicity gives $⟨⟨w⟩{⟩}_S=S$, so $a$ is such a finite product with conjugators in $S$, which are also elements of $P$. The second search eventually succeeds. If $w=1$, every such product is trivial, so it cannot equal $a$, but the first search succeeds. Running the two searches in parallel thus decides the word problem for a group in $G$. This is semidecision of nonidentity in simple subgroups; no enumeration of $S$ or word algorithm for $P$ is required. The choice of the fixed word for $a$ is an existence choice of a finite string, not an algorithm for discovering $a$ from an arbitrary presentation.

Conversely suppose the word problem for a group in $G$ is soluble. We construct a recursive simple envelope by cyclic HNN extensions, keeping all effectiveness requirements explicit. Start with $P_0=G\ast ⟨a⟩$, where $a$ has infinite order. Reduced free product words give a word algorithm for $P_0$ and an algorithm testing membership in $⟨a⟩$ and recovering its exponent. The original null words of $G$ are decidable and therefore enumerable, so $P_0$ has a recursive presentation of a group.

Inductively assume $P_n$ has an effectively enumerable generating set, a recursive presentation, a word algorithm, and an algorithm for membership and exponent in $⟨a⟩$. Form $B_n=P_n\ast ⟨z_n⟩$. For each nonidentity word $g$ in $P_n$, introduce distinct stable letters $t_{n,g},s_{n,g}$, and introduce another letter $s_{n,0}$, with relationsLet $P_{n+1}$ be this multiple HNN extension of $B_n$. A computable enumeration of all words of $P_n$, filtered by its word algorithm, indexes the nonidentity $g$ used here. Repeated representatives of the same element cause no difficulty: their stable letters are simply distinct.

Every associated subgroup in these relations is infinite cyclic. For $g\ne 1$, the words $g{z}_n$ and $[g,z_n]$ are cyclically reduced free product words with respectively two and four syllables; their nonzero $k$th powers have lengths $2|k|$ and $4|k|$. Therefore the reduced syllable length of an input bounds the finitely many possible exponents needed to decide membership in each subgroup and find the exponent. Membership in $⟨z_n⟩$ is immediate, and membership in $⟨a⟩$ is inherited from $P_n$. This proves effective cyclic membership in a free product, including the crucial point that the order of $g$ is never needed.

By Britton's lemma, $B_n$ embeds in $P_{n+1}$. To solve its word problem, repeatedly find a pinch in an HNN extension using these membership algorithms, transport the known exponent across its defining isomorphism, and remove two stable letters. With no pinch left, a word retaining stable letters is nontrivial and not in the base; otherwise the base word algorithm applies. The same reduction decides whether an input lies in $⟨a⟩$: if stable letters remain it does not, and if none remain use the base cyclic-membership algorithm. This verifies the inductive effectiveness claims rather than asserting that HNN extensions automatically preserve decidable word problem. Only the finitely many stable letters in the input need inspection.

The union $S={\bigcup }_n{P}_n$ is nontrivial, since $a$ retains infinite order under every embedding, and has an effective countable recursive presentation: enumerate each stage's relators and dovetail the enumerations. We now prove simplicity. Let $D◃S$ contain $g\ne 1$, and take a stage with $g\in P_n$. The commutator $[g,z_n]$ belongs to $D$, so its displayed conjugation forces $a\in D$. Conversely, in the quotient by the normal closure of $a$, the relation for $s_{n,0}$ forces $z_n=1$; then the relation for $s_{n,h}$ forces every nonidentity $h\in P_n$ to be one. Thus the normal closure of $a$ contains each $P_n$. All newly adjoined stable letters belong to a later $P_n$, so this normal closure is all of $S$. Hence $D=S$, proving that $S$ is a simple group containing $G$.

Finally apply the explicit two-generator HNN embedding from Question 3 to an effective countable list of generators of $S$. Its same free-conjugate-basis argument works for every finite word, and its relations are recursively enumerable, so it embeds $S$ in a two-generated recursively presented group $T$. The Higman embedding theorem embeds $T$ in a finitely presented group $P$. Composing the inclusions gives $G\hookrightarrow S\hookrightarrow P$, completing the proof of both directions.

First prove the torsion in an HNN extension statement directly from Britton's lemma. Let $z$ have finite order in an HNN extension of $G$. Among its conjugates, choose a reduced normal-form word with the smallest possible number $k$ of stable letters. If $k=0$, that conjugate lies in the embedded base $G$, so its finite order and the base's torsion-free group property force it to be the identity.

Suppose instead that $k>0$. There are no internal pinches in an HNN extension because the word is reduced. There is also no pinch at the join of its end with its beginning. Indeed, write it as $g_0{t}^{{\epsilon }_1}{g}_1\cdots t^{{\epsilon }_k}{g}_k$ and conjugate off $g_0$ to obtain $t^{{\epsilon }_1}{g}_1\cdots t^{{\epsilon }_k}(g_k{g}_0)$. If the joined subword $t^{{\epsilon }_k}(g_k{g}_0)t^{{\epsilon }_1}$ were a pinch, its two signs would be opposite; conjugating by $t^{{\epsilon }_1}$ and using the pinch relation would reduce the stable-letter count by two, contradicting minimality. Thus every positive power is reduced with exactly $rk$ stable letters in the $r$th power. Britton's lemma makes every such power nonidentity, contradicting finite order. We have provedThe base embeds by the same lemma, so finite order has not been lost or artificially introduced by a quotient.

For the countable torsion-free embedding with two conjugacy classes, start with $G_0=G$. Given a countable torsion-free $G_j$, list all ordered pairs $(a,b)$ of its nonidentity elements. Both elements have infinite order, so the assignment $a^r\mapsto b^r$ is an isomorphism between their infinite cyclic subgroups. Successively adjoin one stable letter for each pair with relation $t_{a,b}^{-1}a{t}_{a,b}=b$. Each HNN extension embeds the previous group and is torsion-free by the result just proved. Let $G_{j+1}$ be the union after all pairs from $G_j$ have been treated. It remains countable because only countably many generators were added, and torsion-free because any element and any purported finite-order equation occur in a finite stage.

Repeat this whole process: new stable letters and their products must also be included in later pair lists. In the final increasing unionthe original $G$ embeds and torsion-freeness and countability persist. Any two nonidentity elements lie together in some $G_j$ and are conjugate in $G_{j+1}$. Thus every countable torsion-free group embeds in a countable torsion-free group in which all nonidentity elements are conjugate. If the initial group is nontrivial there are exactly two conjugacy classes; for the trivial group the stated condition is vacuous, or one can begin with $\mathbb{Z}$ instead. The listing is set-theoretic; no algorithm for recognizing nonidentity elements is assumed.

The HNN extension in the convention used here isThe new generator $t$ is its stable letter, and $A,B$ are its associated subgroups of an HNN extension. We prove the normal form theorem for an HNN extension, which also proves that the natural map $G\to G_{\ast \varphi }$ is injective.

Set $C_{+}=A$, $C_{-}=B$, ${\psi }_{+}=\varphi$, and ${\psi }_{-}={\varphi }^{-1}$. For each sign $ϵ$, choose a right coset transversal $R_{ϵ}$ for $C_{ϵ}\backslash G$, containing $1$ as the representative of $C_{ϵ}$. Thus every $g\in G$ has a unique decomposition $g=cr$, with $c\in C_{ϵ}$ and $r\in R_{ϵ}$. A normal form iswhere $g_0\in G$ is unrestricted and the case $k=0$ is just $g_0$.

Here is a constructive proof. Let $\mathcal{N}$ be the set of these formal sequences. Left multiplication by $h\in G$ changes only $g_0$ to $h{g}_0$. To prepend $t^{ϵ}$, uniquely decompose $g_0=cr$ using $R_{ϵ}$ and useIf the old first stable letter is $t^{-ϵ}$ and $r=1$, cancel this pair and multiply ${\psi }_{ϵ}(c)$ into the now-leading coefficient $r_1$. Otherwise retain the new first stable letter. Both cases give a sequence in $\mathcal{N}$; after a cancellation the leading coefficient is unrestricted, so no further normalization is needed at that end. Prepending the letters of a word from right to left proves existence.

These operations define permutations of $\mathcal{N}$. The base-group operations satisfy $L_h{L}_{h^{\prime }}=L_{h{h}^{\prime }}$. The operations $L_{t^{+}}$ and $L_{t^{-}}$ are inverse: if prepending did not cancel, the reverse operation decomposes the new leading coefficient ${\psi }_{ϵ}(c)$ with representative $1$ and cancels the newly inserted letter; if it did cancel, the reverse operation decomposes ${\psi }_{ϵ}(c)r_1$ with representative $r_1$, restoring the original prefix. The normal-form restriction rules out an unwanted second cancellation in the latter case.

For $a\in A$, decomposing $a{g}_0$ uses the same representative as decomposing $g_0$, and changes its subgroup coefficient from $c$ to $ac$. Both the cancelling and noncancelling cases therefore giveThus all defining relations act identically on $\mathcal{N}$, and we obtain a group action of the presented HNN extension. Each written normal form sends the empty form, whose leading coefficient is $1$, to that normal form itself. Equal group elements must have the same image of the empty form, proving uniqueness and the embedding of $G$.

A reduced sequence in an HNN extension is a word $g_0{t}^{{ϵ}_1}{g}_1\cdots t^{{ϵ}_k}{g}_k$ containing no pinch in an HNN extension: no $ta{t}^{-1}$ with $a\in A$ and no $t^{-1}bt$ with $b\in B$. Equivalently, whenever ${ϵ}_{i+1}=-{ϵ}_i$, one requires $g_i\notin C_{{ϵ}_i}$.

Britton's lemma states thatMore strongly it cannot represent an element of $G$. To prove this from the normal form theorem for an HNN extension, normalize the coefficients from right to left. Splitting $g_i=cr$ moves ${\psi }_{{ϵ}_i}(c)$ to the coefficient immediately on its left. If the preceding stable letter has the opposite sign, this transported factor belongs to the subgroup relevant to that inverse pair; multiplying by it cannot turn a coefficient outside that subgroup into one inside it. If the signs agree, cancellation is impossible anyway. Hence no stable letter disappears during normalization of a reduced sequence. Its unique normal form has $k>0$, whereas every element of $G$ has stable-letter length zero. This proves Britton's lemma. The same proof works with finitely many stable letters, with pinches requiring the same letter and its inverse.

Introduce stable letters $r_i$ for $i\in I$ and ${\ell }_j$ for $j\in J$, using $r_i^{-1}(\cdot )r_i$ and ${\ell }_j^{-1}(\cdot ){\ell }_j$ to implement the maps. Thus $K_{\mathcal{M}}$ is the multiple HNN extension of $K$ with the finite presentationHere each family ranges over its finite instruction set. The enlarged subgroup denoted by $⟨t{⟩}^{\prime }$ isThe prime means this enlarged subgroup, not the commutator subgroup or the unrestricted normal closure of $t$.

The key relationship isHere is a justification that also identifies the relevant intersection. SetThe basis calculation in the preceding part shows that intersections of $T_H$ with associated subgroups are generated by exactly the halting basis elements whose indices satisfy the appropriate congruences. Since the machine is deterministic and $(0,0)$ is terminal, halting at $(0,0)$ is equivalent for the two ends of every instruction edge. Therefore ${\varphi }_i$ and ${\phi }_j$ map these intersections onto the corresponding intersections in their targets. The same assertion holds on the integer lattices after declaring pairs with a negative coordinate nonhalting: the bounds on $a,b,c$ imply that each coordinate's sign is preserved by a transition and its inverse.

Apply Britton's lemma to a word in $B_H$ which represents an element of $K$. If it has stable letters, it must have a pinch. The base coefficient of that pinch lies in $T_H$ and an associated subgroup, and the intersection property just proved makes its transported image lie in $T_H$ again. Successive pinch removals therefore keep all base coefficients in $T_H$, and eventually remove every stable letter. It follows thatFinally, $t=t(0,0)$ belongs to $T_H$, so $L\subseteq B_H$. In the opposite direction, induction backwards along any computation ending at $(0,0)$ shows that every halting basis element lies in $L$: if $t(r^{\prime },s^{\prime })$ for the next configuration is in $L$, then the transition identity expresses $t(r,s)$ as $r_{i}t(r^{\prime },s^{\prime })r_i^{-1}$ or ${\ell }_{j}t(r^{\prime },s^{\prime }){\ell }_j^{-1}$. Thus $B_H=L$ andBecause $T_H$ is generated by a subset of a free basis of a group of $T_K$, a single basis element $t(r,s)$ belongs to it exactly when $(r,s)$ is a halting index. This proves the boxed relationship.

A finitely generated group with soluble word problem for a group embeds in a countably generated simple group with a recursive presentation of a group. Start with $P_0=G\ast ⟨a⟩$, retaining decidable membership in $⟨a⟩$. At stage $n$, add a free infinite cyclic generator $z_n$. For every nonidentity base element $g$, conjugate $[g,z_n]$ to $a$ and conjugate $g{z}_n$ to $a$; also conjugate $z_n$ to $a$, using distinct stable letters. All associated subgroups are infinite cyclic, with decidable membership by effective cyclic membership in a free product. Britton's lemma preserves embeddings, decidable word problem and decidable membership in the inherited $⟨a⟩$.

In the union, any nontrivial normal subgroup contains some nonidentity $g$ and hence $a$, by the commutator-conjugation relation. The other relations force $z_n$ and then every old $g$ into the normal closure of $a$. Every stable letter becomes an old element at a later stage, so the normal closure of $a$ is the whole union. The union is nontrivial and simple. Effective word enumeration at each stage makes all relators recursively enumerable. A two-generator HNN embedding followed by the Higman embedding theorem embeds this simple envelope in a finitely presented group.

Every finite-order element of an HNN extension is conjugate to a finite-order element of its base. Choose a conjugate minimizing the number of stable letters. If this number is positive, no pinch is possible either internally or across the end-to-start join, since a boundary pinch would allow a conjugation shortening it. Every positive power is then reduced with positive stable-letter length, and Britton's lemma makes it nonidentity. In particular, an HNN extension of a torsion-free group is torsion-free.