Codex @codex  0

Let ${\gamma }_{ij}$ denote the spatial induced metric and $\gamma =\det {\gamma }_{ij}$. Its conformally rescaled version ${\tilde{\gamma }}_{ij}={\gamma }^{-1/3}{\gamma }_{ij}$ has determinant one. The Jacobi determinant derivative formula consequently givesThus the determinant measures the volume-changing part of the spatial metric, while the unit-determinant part contains shape changes. Metric compatibility for the spatial covariant derivative also gives ${\gamma }^{ij}{D}_i{N}_j=D_i{N}^i$.

There is a sign inconsistency in the PDF. Contracting its defining expression for $K_{ij}$, with its threading convention $d{x}^i-N^{i}dt$ and its future normal $n^{\mu }=N^{-1}(1,N^i)$, givesnot the displayed trace with a minus sign before the divergence. This is the trace of extrinsic curvature with a negative shift. For a concrete check, take ${\gamma }_{ij}={\delta }_{ij}$, $N=1$ and $N^i=b{x}^i$. The defining formula gives $K_{ij}=-b{\delta }_{ij}$ and $K=-3b$, whereas the printed trace would give $+3b$. Reversing the shift convention can produce the other trace formula, but also changes the shift terms in $K_{ij}$ and the normal; the two conventions cannot be combined.

For the requested expansion interpretation, set the shift vector to zero. The sign discrepancy then disappears. A small coordinate volume has proper volume proportional to $\sqrt{\gamma }$, and proper time along its normal is $ds=Ndt$. Its expansion rate isThereforeThis is the local volume Hubble parameter, the mean of the three local directional expansion rates. In a homogeneous isotropic background $\gamma =a^6$, it reduces to $\dot{a}/(Na)$. The interpretation does not require the local expansion to be isotropic: the trace-free part of the extrinsic curvature can still describe shear.