This is always true for every positive integer . If were algebraic, then would be a root of the polynomial over the field of algebraic numbers. By transitivity of algebraic extensions, would then be algebraic over , contradicting its transcendence.
Let
If were rational, then
would make rational. But if in lowest terms, then , which is impossible by unique prime factorization: the exponent of on the two sides is respectively a multiple of three and one more than a multiple of three. Therefore
Use the given convergent series
Suppose this number were . Choose large enough that . Multiplication by makes both the rational number and the partial sum through integers. Their difference
would therefore be an integer. It is positive, while
for sufficiently large , a contradiction. Hence
A transcendental number is a complex number that is not a root of any nonzero polynomial with rational, equivalently integer, coefficients. Let
If and were an algebraic number, then would satisfy
over the algebraic extension . By transitivity of algebraic extensions, would be algebraic over , contradicting its transcendence. If , then and would again be algebraic. Thus
An algebraic closure of a field is an algebraically closed field that is an algebraic extension of .
By definition, every element of
is algebraic over , and the question allows us to use that this set is a field. It remains to prove that it is algebraically closed.
Let be nonconstant. Its finitely many coefficients generate a finite extension . By the fundamental theorem of algebra, has a root . Since is a root of a polynomial over , it is algebraic over ; since is algebraic, transitivity of algebraic extensions makes algebraic over . Thus . Repeating after division by shows that splits there, so is algebraically closed and is an algebraic closure of .