The Banach-Steinhaus theorem, or Uniform boundedness principle, states that for a family of bounded linear operators from a Banach space to a normed space , pointwise boundedness for every implies .
For its proof let . These are closed and their union is . The Baire category theorem gives an with nonempty interior, containing a ball . For , both and belong to , so for every . Scaling and taking a limit at the ball boundary gives , proving the theorem. The target need not be complete.
For the asserted bounded-set criterion, use the Banach space , which is complete even if is not. Each defines the bounded linear evaluation functional on . The given hypothesis says this family is pointwise bounded. The Hahn-Banach theorem consequence in the question gives , and uniform boundedness yields
This proves that weak boundedness implies norm boundedness; the two forms of boundedness coincide for a subset of a normed space.
Finally suppose the two continuous duals for and were equal as sets. The unit ball for norm two is bounded under every common continuous functional, using its norm-two continuity. Applying the preceding criterion in norm one bounds that ball in norm one; scaling gives . Reversing the roles gives . The norms would be equivalent. Contrapositively, inequivalent norms have different continuous duals, supplying a linear functional continuous for one and discontinuous for the other.