Lower-tail concentration for a weakly self-bounding function Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
For a nonnegative weakly self-bounding function of independent random variables, a Gaussian lower-tail conclusion requires a further coordinate-increment hypothesis in the standard theorem. Suppose and the measurable coordinate-deleted functions satisfy
Then
This is the weakly self-bounding lower-tail theorem with . The bound on each increment is a separate hypothesis and must not be dropped when invoking that theorem.[ref]
For example, for with independent Bernoulli distribution variables, deleting coordinate changes by . Both displayed hypotheses hold since . With , a downward deviation of has probability at most . If , nonnegativity gives almost surely; if , the lower-tail event is empty.
Put and . The weakly self-bounding function assumptions give and . For , the bound and the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality imply
Let . Dividing by turns this into
and therefore
Since as , integration gives
Subtracting from both sides yields
as required. This is a Herbst argument with a variance proxy controlled by itself.
Let be the longest increasing subsequence length after deleting coordinate . Then . Choose one longest increasing subsequence of length . If deleting reduces the optimum, then must belong to ; consequently at most coordinates can satisfy . Hence
so is a weakly self-bounding function. The variance bound for a weakly self-bounding function gives
Variance bound for a weakly self-bounding function Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
For a weakly self-bounding function of independent random variables, the coordinatewise variance inequality gives
where .