Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 26 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The required anomaly cancellation depends on the exact Eisenstein series of weight two lawHere is a way to establish it without assuming that is a modular form. The lattice definition of the completed nonholomorphic Eisenstein series in Question 6 is modular invariant. Its Poisson summation calculation, proved there, gives the finite Laurent coefficient at asThe residue is constant, so is also invariant. This calculation uses only convergent Gaussian integrals and the analytic infinite product, not modularity of that product. Using the Wirtinger derivative , with , differentiation of the locally uniformly convergent series givesDifferentiate to see that transforms with weight two. Substituting yieldssince . This is the weight-two transformation from an invariant Eisenstein limit.
Combine this law with the derivative transformation of a weak modular form proved in part (i). The anomalous terms in cancel exactly, leaving the weight- transformation law. Both functions are holomorphic on the complex upper half-plane, and their Fourier expansions contain no negative powers. Hence the Serre derivative satisfiesIts constant coefficient is ; it need not be a cusp form when is not cuspidal.