Source: cirosantilli/donald-trump

= Donald Trump
{c}
{wiki}

= Trump
{c}
{synonym}

Trump's election was an act of protest by the people, because they felt, and rightly so, that the promises by the <democrats> to decrease <social inequality> were just full of <shit>.

So instead, the old voice of <nationalism> spoke louder.

Ciro agrees with analysis of <Can't get you out of my head by Adam Curtis (2021)> that this is largely because <governments have lost all power to companies>[government is losing all power to do anything meaningful]. So the only thing left to do is to speak empty words to calm, or exacerbate, people's fears and hopes.

Ciro believes it is important not hate Trump and his believers, no matter how disgusting Trump might seem, a large part of which is likely theater. We have to try and understand them instead.

Trump's election shows clearly how the <democrats> let down the poor. This understanding is a good thing. It shows that we all have to make greater efforts to help the poor. Just voting for some random democrat candidate who doesn't really care every four years is not enough.

Another positive point of Trump's election is that it further highlighted the power of <social media> even further: it now feels more likely than ever before that anyone can run for office, since a president without any previous political office was elected (of course, being filthy reach helps a lot still, which is a problem). And this further highlights the need for regulate <social media>, to prevent events such as <the deplatforming of Donald Trump>

We should calmly analyze and understand how someone that tries their best to appear disgusting managed to win. Some interesting analyses of Trump's character:
* https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/ The Mind of Donald Trump by Dan P. McAdams (2016):
  > It was as if the golden-haired guest sitting across the table were an actor playing a part on the London stage.

    "It was Donald Trump playing Donald Trump," Griffin observed. There was something unreal about it.
  and the author comments:
  > My aim is to develop a dispassionate and analytical perspective on Trump, drawing upon some of the most important ideas and research findings in psychological science today.
  which is exactly the right way to approach things.

<Falun Gong>'s support for Trump is described at: https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/flg-trump at <cirosantilli china dictatorship>.

https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/stack-overflow-forbids-criticizing-the-character-of-genocidal-political-leaders-like-xi-jinping

Most damning moments:
* about women:
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_Trump_Access_Hollywood_tape&oldid=1001865204#Trump's_responses "Grab'em by the pussy" admissions, and later unadmissions
  * https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/[] quotes an interview by Mark Singer from 1990's:
    > "O.K., I guess I'm asking, do you consider yourself <ideal> company?"

      You really want to know what I consider ideal company?," Trump replied. "A total piece of ass."
* corruption
  * This was a beautiful comment, since it highlights not only that Trump is corrupt, but also that highlights that the others are corrupt, which is why the people elected him. TODO find video https://www.vox.com/2015/8/6/9114565/donald-trump-debate-money[]:
    > Q: You've also supported a host of other liberal policies, you've also donated to several Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton included, Nancy Pelosi. You explained away those donations saying you did that to get business related favors. And you said recently, quote, when you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do.

  TRUMP: You better believe it... I will tell you that our system is broken. I gave to many people. Before this, before two months ago, I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them, two years later, three years later, I call them. They are there for me. And that's a broken system.

\Video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHYk0K7iszo]
{title=Fifth Republican Primary Debate - Main Stage - December 15 2015 on CNN}
{description=
This perfectly summarizes the spectrum of <republican> politics. The only candidate who said anything decent were the two least popular ones, notably:
* Rand Paul, saying that interventionism in the Middle East was a failure (Jeb notably still wants to repeat his brother's mistakes!), and supporting <freedom of speech> rather than censorship and violation of privacy
* Carly Fiorina, saying that the people must take the country back
The others are mostly fear-mongering and saying "we will destroy ISIS", to avoid actually dealing with the more important questions: the people have no power anymore.
}
{start=513}

\Video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuXlf7oTfLE]
{title=SMALL LOAN OF A MILLION DOLLARS - Remix Compilation by TwinkieMan (2015)}
{description=Nothing synthesizes is how bad the democrats have failed to help the poor. This is who got elected.}