= Forester
{c}
https://www.jonmsterling.com/tfmt-0001.xml
Intro/docs: https://www.jonmsterling.com/jms-005P.xml
This is the project with the closest philosophy to <OurBigBook> that <Ciro Santilli> has ever found. It just tends to be even more idealistic than, <OurBigBook> in general, which is insane!
Source code: https://sr.ht/~jonsterling/forester[]. Not on <GitHub>, too much idealism.
Sample source file: https://git.sr.ht/~jonsterling/public-trees/tree/2356f52303c588fadc2136ffaa168e9e5fbe346c/item/jms-00WK.tree
Author's main social media account seems to be: https://mathstodon.xyz/@jonmsterling e.g. https://mathstodon.xyz/@jonmsterling/111359099228291730
They have `\Include` like <OurBigBook>, nice: https://www.jonmsterling.com/jms-007L.xml[], but OMG that name `\transclude{xxx-NNNN}`!!
Headers have open/close:
``
\subtree[jms-00YG]{}
``
<OurBigBook> considered this, but went with `parent=` instead finally.
Does not encourage human readable IDs, uses stuff like `jms-00YG`.
The markup doesn't seem to have any insane constructs, you have to type out open paragraphs everywhere?! OMG, too idealistic, not enough pragmatism.
Jon has some very good theory of <personal knowledge base>, rationalizing several points that <Ciro Santilli> had in his mind but hadn't fully put into words, which is quite cool.