= Mathematical formulation of quantum field theory
TODO holy crap, even this is hard to understand/find a clear definition of.
The <Dirac equation>, OK, is a <partial differential equation>, so we can easily understand its definition with basic calculus. We may not be able to solve it efficiently, but at least we understand it.
But what the heck is the mathematical model for a quantum field theory? TODO someone was saying it is equivalent to an infinite set of PDEs somehow. Investigate. Related:
* https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/74qeag/what_is_so_hard_about_qft_after_all/
* https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/337423/what-are-quantum-fields-mathematically
* https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/155608/what-is-a-quantum-field
The <path integral formulation> might actually be the most understandable formulation, as shown at <Richard Feynman Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture at University of Auckland (1979)>.
The formulation of QFT also appears to be a form of infinite-dimentional calculus.
<Quantum electrodynamics by Lifshitz et al. 2nd edition (1982)> chapter 1. "The uncertainty principle in the relativistic case" contains an interesting idea:
\Q[
The foregoing discussion suggests that the theory will not consider the time dependence of particle interaction processes. It will show that in these processes there are no characteristics precisely definable (even within the usual limitations of quantum mechanics); the description of such a process as occurring in the course of time is therefore just as unreal as the classical paths are in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The only observable quantities are the properties (momenta,
polarizations) of free particles: the initial particles which come into interaction, and the final particles which result from the process.
]