= Anonymity of the donation
The anonymity of the donation is mind blowing.
The first sensation <Ciro Santilli> got was as if <God> himself had come down from heaven to toy with an unsuspecting human being. God running an experiment. Or perhaps an <AGI> that had already secretly taken over. Not very different.
Like with God, this was the answer to Ciro's prayers on <Twitter>. A one way conversation that leaves you uncertain of the details.
Whichever the case, Ciro is going to put on the best show he possibly can for your money, documenting every step along the way in usual fashion!
Besides the awesomeness however, anonymity is a risk.
Ciro ran this over and over in his head, and the only big risk of anonymity is that if this money is ever proven to be from the proceeds of crime, he would have to give it back to the government and "lose one year's salary he would have otherwise gained".
However, that worst case scenario is not bad enough. If anything, it was a great excuse to quit his job for his family and wife is already worth it. Ciro could do it and survive, though situation would deteriorate slowly. <don't be a pussy>[But he was a coward previously].
Ciro does however feel that there is good chance that it is legitimate.
<Ciro Santilli's Stack Overflow contributions> are exceptional, he's amazing right! He deserves this! Of course, there is danger in this rationale which scammers could exploit. But bro, if scammers are going to send 100k USD to me, then please continue to do so!
Also which criminal would be stupid enough to donate proceeds of crime to a highly public person who is going to clearly announce it?
Just be warned, if you come with a baseball bat trying to get the money back by force, I will call the police immediately and by God you will not get it!!
Given this, Ciro just keeps thinking about the likely profile of the donor:
* 10m+ net worth
* either got rich with <Monero>, or thought <Monero> was interesting and wanted to test it out while doing something cool. Also perhaps he has a personal stake in Monero and is trying to advertise it?
But the "why anonymous if not criminal" question remains. Generally rich people want recognition both for:
* reputation washing
* to make their donation mechanisms higher profile which allows raising more and attracting better candidates and reach greater impact
Two options that come to mind:
* rich crypto dude that doesn't want thieves to know he is rich
* more public rich person that doesn't want association with <Ciro Santilli's naughty projects>, notably <Ciro Santilli's campaign for freedom of speech in China>, but perhaps also <CIA 2010 covert communication websites>, which could hurt business.
* crazy rich person with a philosophy of "if they knew who I was it might interfere with what they do". AKA a <God>.
Back to article page