{c}
{tag=Idealist}
{tag=Stack Overflow user}

= ElectricRCAircraftGuy
{synonym}
{title2}

\Image[https://web.archive.org/web/20240219050943im_/https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6842199?v=4]
{title=<Gabriel Staples>}
{source=https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy}

* Homepage: https://gabrielstaples.com
* <GitHub>: https://github.com/ElectricRCAircraftGuy
* <Twitter>: https://x.com/eRCaGuy
* <Stack Overflow>: https://stackoverflow.com/users/4561887/gabriel-staples[]. Contains a beautiful quote:
  > Working hard to make the <Internet> more complete.
  Yes, sir.

  One day <Ciro Santilli> got an upvote on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4713088/how-do-i-use-git-bisect/22592593#22592593[his answer to "How to use Git bisect?"]. As often happens, he had a second look at the question and his answer. But weird thing showed up: the question was now open again, and he was certain that some stupid <closurist> had previously closed it. Upon looking at https://stackoverflow.com/posts/4713088/timeline[], he saw that it was Gabriel that had started the successful reopen vote.
* https://github.com/sponsors/ElectricRCAircraftGuy[]:
  > I'd really like to work on <open source> projects more, but the need for a full-time job makes that difficult. If you can sponsor me, you help me get one step closer to my dream of not having to work a traditional "day job" anymore, so I can contribute more to the open source community, do more to educate, and do more to confront new and challenging ideas.
* https://x.com/eRCaGuy/status/1305275684592340992[]: it's hard to say if he's joking about actually getting a reply from Bezos or if he thinks it might actually happen:
  > I emailed <Jeff Bezos> today about some concerns I've been having selling on \#Amazon. We'll see if he responds. Hopefully in my email I come across respectful. I think my point \#3 (that sellers having negative experiences affects their recruiting) is a real, legitimate concern.


Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

 Incoming links: Gabriel Staples