{wiki}

Good <phylogenetic tree> as usual: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal&oldid=1053478004#Phylogeny


Animal subclade

{wiki}

TODO vs <Phylogenetic tree>? https://www.visiblebody.com/blog/phylogenetic-trees-cladograms-and-how-to-read-them[]:
> Cladograms and phylogenetic trees are functionally very similar, but they show different things. Cladograms do not indicate time or the amount of difference between groups, whereas phylogenetic trees often indicate time spans between branching points.


Cladogram

{wiki}

It is quite <mind blowing> that this is <polyphyletic> on <mammals> and <birds>, what can't <parallel evolution> achieve??

\Image[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Phylogenetic-Groups.svg]
{title=<Phylogenetic tree> of the <vertebrates>}
{description=Highlights how <birds> should obviously be classified as <reptiles>.}


Homeothermy

{wiki}

Good <phylogenetic tree>: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mammal&oldid=1052295685#Molecular_classification_of_placentals


Mammal

{c}

Interesting <fractal> approach to a <phylogenetic tree>: https://www.onezoom.org/

Mostly data driven.


OneZoom

Does not appear to refer to any one specific <phylogenetic tree>[phylogenetic] level, it usually refers to either:
* <Saccharomyces cerevisiae>, the model <eukaryote> <unicellular organism>
* two phila of the <fungus> <kingdom (biology)>


Yeast

{wiki}

= Tree of life
{synonym}
{title2}

It is important to note that due to <horizontal gene transfer>, the early days of life, and still <bacteria> to this day due to <bacterial conjugation>, are actually a <graph> and not a <tree (data structure)>, see also: <image Graph of life>.

Definitely have a look at: <coral of life> representations.


Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

 Incoming links: Phylogenetic tree