Ampleness on reduced components
ID: ampleness-on-reduced-components
On a projective scheme, a line bundle is ample exactly when its restriction to every reduced irreducible component is ample. The disjoint union of those components maps finitely and surjectively to the scheme, so finite-surjective descent of the finite pullback of an ample line bundle proves this. The same argument applies to restrictions to any closed subscheme. Thus nilpotent structure does not affect ampleness.
New to topics? Read the docs here!