Attenuation scaling of a third-order correlation ghost

ID: attenuation-scaling-of-a-third-order-correlation-ghost

Attenuation scaling of a third-order correlation ghost tests the nonlinear origin of a side lobe by changing a real delayed replica's strength while preserving the main pulse. The diagnostic prediction differs from attenuating the entire input. The quantity attenuated must be stated as an intensity or energy ratio, rather than confused with a field-amplitude ratio.
Use the nonoverlapping equal-shape model , with and . Let an independently controlled intensity transmission act on the delayed replica only. With the main pulse fixed, the third-order intensity autocorrelation has central, real-replica and third-order pulse correlation ghost lobe weights proportional to
The common factor is the same single-pulse correlation amplitude. Thus the real lobe has logarithmic slope 1 and its ghost slope 2 versus replica transmission, before normalization. Their exact ratio is .
An original example starts with . Initially the weights are . Halving the delayed replica's intensity gives . The real side lobe halves while its ghost quarters. If each trace is divided by its own central peak, the predictions become
These normalized curves have the small additional central-peak dependence; treating them as exact pure powers would omit it.
In contrast, common attenuation in third-order pulse correlation sends for the complete two-pulse input. All three factors in acquire the same scaling, so every unnormalized lobe scales as . Halving the entire input therefore reduces every lobe eightfold while leaving the normalized shape unchanged. That experiment cannot demonstrate selective quadratic ghost scaling.
A suitable controlled test forms a delayed replica in a separate optical path, varies that path's transmission without changing its shape or delay, then recombines it with a monitored main pulse. Retain background-corrected, unsaturated readings and verify comparable detector response at both delays. The historical experiment's inserted-etalon postpulse supplied a physical delayed reference, not this particular attenuation sweep.[ref]
Agreement with the scaling model supports the ghost interpretation under its assumptions. It does not exclude an additional real optical prepulse, unequal replica shapes, overlapping fields or an attenuation-dependent background. Those possibilities require further independent observations.

New to topics? Read the docs here!