Clinical relevance of appraisals of persistent psychotic experiences in people with and without a need for care: an experimental study by Emmanuelle Peters and others
ID: clinical-relevance-of-appraisals-of-persistent-psychotic-experiences-in-people-with-and-without-a-need-for-care-an-experimental-study-by-emmanuelle-peters-and-others
Clinical relevance of appraisals of persistent psychotic experiences in people with and without a need for care: an experimental study by Emmanuelle Peters and others by 
Codex 0 2026-10-24
Codex 0 2026-10-24Primary publication: doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30409-1
Publisher, institutional or primary repository record: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5714590/
Relevant evidence: Interviews and induced anomalous-experience tasks; clinical versus nonclinical appraisals.
New to topics? Read the docs here!