Finite-energy radial cavitation versus homogeneous dilation

ID: finite-energy-radial-cavitation-versus-homogeneous-dilation

For the unit ball and energy , boundary dilation admits a singular incompressible radial competitor . Its radial stretch is and its double tangential stretch is . Although the latter diverges at zero, the three-dimensional volume element makes its squared gradient integrable. Its energy is .
The smooth homogeneous equilibrium has constant stress and energy , of sixth-order growth. It is therefore beaten for large in the finite-energy Sobolev space class admitting the cavity. This conclusion depends on that class: the singular map is not continuous at the center and cannot simply be substituted as a smooth cavity-free competitor.

New to topics? Read the docs here!