Multiple isomorphous replacement

ID: multiple-isomorphous-replacement

Multiple isomorphous replacement combines a native X-ray diffraction data set with data from two or more heavy-atom derivatives to estimate the native structure factor phases. In the ideal crystal isomorphism model, each derivative adds a constraint . Consistently referenced heavy-atom models can distinguish the two alternatives left by single isomorphous replacement.[ref]
Continue the original example in single isomorphous replacement, where both fit the native amplitude5 and first derivative with . Choose a second reference . Its predicted squared amplitudes differ:
A measured second-derivative amplitude therefore selects in this exact model. If the second reference had instead been real, both candidates would still have equal magnitudes after adding it. An additional derivative must contribute useful geometry, rather than merely repeat a constraint.
The heavy-atom models must share a consistent coordinate origin and handedness. Resolving a circle-crossing ambiguity does not by itself determine absolute handedness: conjugating all the amplitudes preserves their magnitudes. CCP4's diagrams explicitly retain this distinction.[ref]
The method has a concrete experimental history. The opening of the1960 myoglobin structure report describes several mercury- or gold-containing derivatives whose X-ray diffraction patterns were compared with the unsubstituted protein. These measurements had supplied phases for the earlier map at spacings greater than6Å; the new report advanced the analysis to2Å.[ref] Different labeled crystals supplied information unavailable from native intensities alone.

New to topics? Read the docs here!