 Paris models are well-founded when their complete theory has a well-founded model

Let $N$ be a well-founded model of set theory of a complete theory $T\supseteq \mathsf{ZFC}$, and let $M$ be a Paris model of $T$. If the internal ordinals of $M$ admitted an external descending sequence ${\alpha }_0{\ni }^M{\alpha }_1{\ni }^M\cdots$, choose formulas ${\phi }_n$ defining them. Completeness makes $M$ and $N$ satisfy the same sentences, so the unique ordinals defined by the ${\phi }_n$ in $N$ would form an externally descending membership sequence. This contradicts well-foundedness of $N$.