Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-advanced-quantum-physics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2021/section-b/4/d/solution

At resonance, retain the signed coupling . In the interaction picture, the given solution reduces to and . Returning to the Schrödinger picture gives
For a normalized spinor , the Pauli matrices give . Therefore the spin expectation value within the rotating-wave approximation is
Its magnitude is : the Bloch vector stays on the unit sphere. In a frame rotating about at angular velocity , it makes a uniform rotation in the plane. For , this gives slow Rabi oscillations between the poles, accompanied by rapid laboratory Larmor precession about .
If the same formula is formally used for , it predicts fast meridional rotations whose plane turns slowly about . However, the original PDF really does ask for this opposite limit, and it lies outside the assumption used in part (b). That formal description is not a controlled prediction for the stated linearly driven Hamiltonian operator.
A valid strong-drive description starts from the exact equation for the Bloch vector :
For times , neglecting the weak bias gives a controlled leading approximation, since the time integral of the omitted Hamiltonian operator has small norm. The remaining field has a fixed axis, so its generators commute at different times and
At the nominal resonance and on the early spin-rotation scale , this becomes . The initial rotation rate is consequently , twice the rate predicted by extrapolating the rotating-wave approximation. For longer times the exact differential equation must be retained. The following original calculation illustrates both regimes rather than asserting an exact strong-drive Rabi formula.
Figure 1.
Laboratory spin trajectories for weak and strong transverse driving
. Original solutions of the full time-dependent spin equation at nominal resonance, compared with the rotating-wave approximation. Top panels show the Bloch vector trajectory (the first half-cycle for weak driving); bottom panels compare its component. Time is . The weak-drive case agrees closely over a Rabi cycle; the strong-drive case demonstrates why the approximation cannot be extrapolated to . Details.

New to topics? Read the docs here!