Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2002/iii/paper-20/1/iv/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 1 iv Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We first justify the relevant pointwise epimorphism in a functor category criterion. A componentwise surjective function gives an epimorphism, because equality of two composites can be cancelled at each component. Conversely, for a natural transformation , form the pointwise pushout . Restrictions of preserve the identifications imposed by , so these pointwise sets and restrictions form a categorical presheaf. The two inclusions satisfy . If is epic, . At an object , an element outside the image of would retain two distinct copies in , contradicting this equality. Thus every is surjective.
Apply this criterion to at . Surjectivity of supplies with . Conversely, if , then , making a split epimorphism and hence an epimorphism. Therefore
New to topics? Read the docs here!