Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2002/iii/paper-20/11/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 11 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-14
Write the adjunction unit and adjunction counit of as . Its induced monad is , with multiplication . The Eilenberg-Moore comparison functor isThe unit law for is , a triangle identity for an adjunction. Naturality of at gives ; applying gives . Naturality at gives the monad algebra morphism equation for . Thus is well-defined.
For each , consider the fork in It commutes by the naturality equation just used. Its image under is the fork of the preceding question, with parallel morphisms and final map . It is split using and . By the assumed reflection, is the coequalizer of this pair in .
For fullness, let be a monad algebra morphism. Thus satisfies . Set . We verify explicitly that equalizes the two morphisms of the displayed fork. The monad algebra morphism equation givesNaturality of first at and then at givesThe coequalizer therefore supplies a unique with . Applying yields . The map is split epic with section , so cancellation gives . This proves fullness, and the earlier cancellation proves faithfulness. HenceNo claim that is essentially surjective is needed; that stronger conclusion needs the corresponding existence hypotheses.
New to topics? Read the docs here!