Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2003/ia/paper-4/2c/iii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 ia Paper 4 2C iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
This is not an equivalence relation. For , , so reflexivity fails. It is symmetric, because is the conjugate of , and an integer is real. It also fails transitivity: take and . Then are integers but is not. A single failure would suffice, but these examples identify exactly which properties break.
New to topics? Read the docs here!