Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2003/iii/paper-30/4/a/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 30 4 a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Set . It may be , but cannot be because is finite. Fix and write , . Repeated use of the subadditive sequence inequality giveswhere . Dividing by and letting gives . Since this holds for every , the upper limit of a sequence is at most , while every ratio is at least . If is finite these bounds agree. If , choose with below any prescribed real number; the same upper-limit bound proves convergence to . This establishes the extended-real Fekete lemma:A finite real limit of a sequence requires a lower linear bound. For example satisfies the premise but has normalized limit of a sequence , so that qualification cannot be dropped.
New to topics? Read the docs here!