Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2003/iii/paper-9/5/b/solution

We prove sufficiency by a non-tangential maximal function and the layer cake representation. Write . First : three hyperbolic geodesic caps corresponding to arcs of normalized length , with equally spaced centers, cover the unit disc. This handles interior points and large arcs, not only a thin boundary strip.
Fix aperture two and set . The crucial H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk is
Here is its endpoint proof. For let , which is holomorphic across the closed unit disc. Since modulus powers of holomorphic functions are subharmonic, Poisson comparison gives
The estimate that a Poisson maximal function is dominated by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function yields . The strong Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality now gives
For each interior point , hence . The Fatou lemma proves the maximal inequality. This uses a genuine maximal bound; the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is not strongly bounded on .
For , the set is open, since each interior point witnessing this strict inequality has an open boundary shadow. Write its disjoint arc components as . If and , the arc centered at with angular half-width lies in , because there. Thus it lies in one component , and has angular projection in with . The geodesic-cap and Carleson-box comparison puts all such points in for a fixed enlargement factor whenever is small. For large , use . If or is the entire circle, that same total-mass estimate applies. Summing, without needing the enlarged caps to be disjoint, gives
The layer cake representation and the proved H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk finish the argument:
Thus the two conditions are equivalent, with their least admissible constants comparable: and . This is the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk, proved at the analytic endpoint.

New to topics? Read the docs here!