Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2004/iii/paper-61/1/e/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 61 1 e Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First remove the observation time from the spectral amplitude. For any fixed horizon , replace by in the formula of part (d). The difference in the boundary integral is proportional toFor every , this integrand is holomorphic inside , where , and decays on its large closing arcs. The Cauchy integral theorem makes the difference zero. This finite-horizon extension of a boundary transform therefore gives the time-independent spectraAll observation-time dependence is now in .
When the boundary history is sufficiently decaying, the natural long-time version isThe integral converges in for bounded boundary data and on its boundary for integrable histories; otherwise one must state an Abel prescription or a suitable temporal growth assumption. Arbitrary smooth need not have such an infinite-time transform. The finite-horizon formula remains exact without that extra assumption, and the source alone does not prescribe a universal long-time limit.
A useful further decomposition, if with integrable , isThis separates the persistent forcing from the transient spectrum. The pole at , where , accounts for the decaying stationary profile ; that profile also follows directly from , spatial decay and its boundary value. For the remaining oscillatory integrals the phase is . At a fixed ray , its stationary points satisfy , or . These time-independent amplitudes expose precisely the poles and saddle points used in the method of steepest descent; allowable deformations must also respect the analyticity strip of the initial transform.
New to topics? Read the docs here!