Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2004/iii/paper-76/2/iv/solution

Let , choose a consistent branch, and truncate the corrected series after , with . The leading factorial tail in part (iii) is represented by the same indented integral as in part (ii):
Here the divergent sum means its lateral Borel summation, not ordinary summation. To see why the pole approximation controls this remainder, write and insert in the leading late terms. Summing the geometric tail creates ; produces . The relative corrections to the late coefficients give lower-order contributions on its saddle scale. More concretely, the Borel transform of the coefficient series is
The simple pole supplies the leading Stokes phenomenon; its weaker logarithmic singularity supplies the smaller corrections. This is the integral justification for retaining the factorial tail.
For , expand . Part (i), with , now gives
This formula uses the upper-pole prescription and the upper Airy function switching ray: near , take near zero. The coefficient of the subdominant exponential changes smoothly from zero to across this ray and has value on it. The angular transition width is . The conjugate lower ray has the conjugate contour sign, rather than the same on both rays. This is error-function smoothing of a Stokes multiplier, not a discontinuity of the analytic Airy function. With the literal printed series, the missing would invalidate this remainder formula.

New to topics? Read the docs here!