Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/ii/paper-4/16h/solution

A relation on a set is a well-founded relation when every nonempty subset contains an element with no satisfying . The well-founded recursion theorem states that a rule assigning a value at from the already assigned values at its predecessors determines a unique function on ; the rule must give a unique set-valued output for every possible predecessor assignment. No choice or transitivity of is needed.
Apply recursion with
The empty supremum is zero. Well-founded induction makes every value an ordinal; the Axiom schema of replacement collects the values into a set. Choose an ordinal larger than every value. Then , and implies , hence .
Conversely, suppose such an ordinal-valued function exists. In any nonempty , choose whose value is the least ordinal in . There can be no with , because it would have smaller value. Thus is well-founded, proving the equivalence.
Using the axiom of choice, fix a well-order of . Order its elements lexicographically by : first compare the ordinal rank, and for equal ranks use . Every nonempty subset has a smallest rank and then a least element in that rank fibre, so this is a well-order. Since strictly increases rank, it respects every original relation pair. Hence every well-founded relation extends to a well-order under choice.

New to topics? Read the docs here!