Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-24/4/d/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 24 4 d Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the intended standard Hopf link, identify with the unit sphere in and its two components with the coordinate circles and . Outside small neighborhoods of those circles, both coordinates are nonzero, and their arguments together with giveOn this product the longitude of either component is the meridian of the other. Therefore the two attaching meridians become the two coordinate curves of , intersecting exactly once. Adding the product collar does not change a gluing of solid tori. The meridian-intersection-one argument in Question 2(c) identifies the result with the standard genus-one splitting of the sphere. Thus zero surgery on the Hopf link gives
There is a genuine link-type qualification in the wording: merely specifying two linked but individually unknotted components does not determine the Hopf link. For example the two components of the torus link are unknotted but have linking number . Filling their preferred longitudes is zero surgery with linking matrixso the resulting first homology is its cokernel, , rather than the zero group of . The cokernel formula follows because zero longitudes impose twice the other meridian as the homology relations. Thus the sphere answer applies to the standard once-linked Hopf interpretation; the literal unspecified link description alone is insufficient to force a single manifold.
New to topics? Read the docs here!