Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-58/1/e/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 58 1 e Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Consider any POVM, not necessarily rank one, with two distinct reported outcomes intended to identify the two states. Its effects satisfy and ; equality holds for a two-outcome measurement. If , then positivity and completeness force . Taking a positive square root gives . Likewise, and imply , or .
Using Hermiticity,Thus perfect discrimination of pure states requires orthogonality, contradicting the proposed nonzero overlap. This proves perfect discrimination of pure states requires orthogonality for arbitrary generalized measurements. Measurements with an inconclusive outcome can sometimes identify nonorthogonal inputs unambiguously, but unambiguous quantum state discrimination has a nonzero failure probability and is not perfect deterministic discrimination.
New to topics? Read the docs here!