Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-12/4/c/solution

The printed assertion is false. Take real with . The principal complex logarithm is unambiguous, but
No finite can satisfy the proposed estimate, even on these points within the logarithm's domain. At the logarithm is undefined, and the usual principal analytic branch also excludes its cut. These are additional reasons the literal all- assertion cannot hold.
The valid estimate for the final product proof is instead
or equivalently for every , including . The upper bound on the real part of the logarithm is enough for growth; a bound on the full modulus of the logarithm is unnecessary. The preceding root Solution supplies the complete convergence and exponential-growth proof using this correction.

New to topics? Read the docs here!