Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-37/1/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 37 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
As with quadratic variation, the increasing process must be normalized by . Suppose have this initial value and both and are continuous local martingales. Since and these differences are continuous, both and are continuous. Their difference is a finite-variation process, andis a continuous local martingale. The result proved in part (a) makes this difference constant. Its initial value is zero, so and are indistinguishable. This is the uniqueness of an increasing square compensator; it uses no existence argument.
If no initial-value normalization is imposed, the literal uniqueness assertion is false: whenever works, works for every deterministic constant , since subtracting a constant preserves the local martingale property. The exact unnormalized conclusion is for all , up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
New to topics? Read the docs here!