Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/ii/paper-4/23g/iv/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 4 23G iv Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The same pole-order argument provides a basisFor the first set contains elements, and the second contains . Distinct pole orders imply linear independence, and the coordinate-ring expression proves spanning. HenceFor a function in the space would have no poles anywhere and would vanish at infinity; a regular function on a projective integral curve is constant, so it must be zero. Equivalently the coordinate-ring pole argument first makes it constant, then the vanishing condition excludes nonzero constants.
New to topics? Read the docs here!