Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/ii/paper-4/23g/iv/solution

The same pole-order argument provides a basis
For the first set contains elements, and the second contains . Distinct pole orders imply linear independence, and the coordinate-ring expression proves spanning. Hence
For a function in the space would have no poles anywhere and would vanish at infinity; a regular function on a projective integral curve is constant, so it must be zero. Equivalently the coordinate-ring pole argument first makes it constant, then the vanishing condition excludes nonzero constants.

New to topics? Read the docs here!