Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2011/ii/paper-4/29j/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 4 29J Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Write , , both positive, and . As usual the utility expectations must be meaningful; the improvement below is supported where both consumptions and derivatives are bounded, so it produces finite strictly positive expected gains without a tail differentiation problem.
Suppose is not almost surely constant. Choose and positive-probability sets and on which respectively and . By restricting these sets if necessary, keep both consumptions bounded and bounded away from zero, and their marginal utilities bounded. Put , , and choose strictly between and . For , we haveReplace by for small positive . Agent one's utility has first derivative , and agent two's has derivative . Positivity of consumptions is preserved on the bounded support, and uniform Taylor estimates there make both actual gains positive for sufficiently small . Thus a Pareto-efficient transfer must satisfy
For given total wealth , let be agent two's consumption. The ratio is continuous and strictly increasing for , by strict concavity. The endpoint marginal-utility assumptions give as and as . Thus it has a unique solution to . Continuous dependence on follows from strict monotonicity and continuity, so this solution is a measurable wealth-sharing rule. ThereforeFor a fixed weight, it is also the pointwise maximizer of , whose strict concavity confirms uniqueness.
New to topics? Read the docs here!