Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/iii/paper-45/3/solution

First use the actual PDF boost bracket ; replacing the final by , as the TeX transcription does, would be a different and incorrect algebra. Expanding the three brackets yields
Thus
The two sets have SU(2)-type brackets. Their compact real form exponentiates to , whereas their full complexification exponentiates to . This does not turn the physical real Lorentz group into a compact product. With Hermitian , , and the two factors are tied by the Lorentz reality condition; the connected physical spin cover is .
For the right-handed spinor representation, the supplied sigma formula gives and . Therefore
It is the representation in this definition of . These are finite-dimensional representation matrices; the boosts are not Hermitian for a positive-definite spinor inner product, as expected for a noncompact group. They are distinct from the operator-component commutator coefficients discussed in Question 1.
For the group map, encode a real Minkowski vector by the Hermitian matrix
The trace identity recovers its contravariant components. For , is Hermitian and has the same determinant. Expanding in that basis gives
The coefficients are real because the trace of a product of Hermitian matrices is real. Equality of determinants for all proves . The action for is the composition of the two actions, proving the homomorphism law.
Since is connected and the identity maps to the identity, its image has determinant and preserves time orientation. More directly, positive-definite matrices representing future timelike vectors remain positive definite under . The kernel is : if every Hermitian is fixed, first makes unitary, and then commutation with all Hermitian matrices makes it a scalar with determinant one.
Conversely, gives every spatial rotation, and positive Hermitian determinant-one matrices give every pure boost. Rotation-boost decomposition yields every proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation. Thus the formula gives the Lorentz spinor double cover
It is a map into as asked, with precisely its identity component as image; it does not produce disconnected time-reversing transformations.

New to topics? Read the docs here!