Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/iii/paper-60/4/i/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 60 4 i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let be the linear spherical-collapse threshold and let be the linear growth factor, normalized to one at the epoch to which the random density field has been extrapolated. The time-dependent barrier is . The smoothed matter density variance is the variance of the linear density contrast smoothed with a spherical top-hat window function whose comoving mass is . Both quantities must refer to the same linear normalization; equivalently use .
Let denote the comoving number density and write for the positive differential Press-Schechter halo mass function. With the mean comoving mass density, the mass fraction obeysDifferentiating the complementary error function and using givesThis is the requested mass function; is the abundance per unit natural logarithmic mass. For physical rather than comoving number density, multiply by . The normalization in the Press-Schechter formalism includes its factor of two relative to the positive Gaussian tail, so tends to one as the smoothing mass tends to zero when diverges. It is a collapse prescription, not the probability that an arbitrary already nonlinear density field stays Gaussian.
New to topics? Read the docs here!