Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/iii/paper-73/2/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 73 2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the Landau intermittency counterexample, combine two locally homogeneous turbulent populations, with the same sufficiently wide inertial interval but different viscous dissipation rates and . This can mean an ensemble randomly selected between two intensities, or large turbulent patches whose small-scale increments are sampled away from the patch boundaries. Suppose each population individually obeys the proposed universal coefficient . If their proportions are and , the combined longitudinal structure function isIts effective coefficient referenced to the global mean viscous dissipation is thereforeFor a concrete example let and , with . ThenFor this is , explicitly dependent on the strength of the large-scale modulation. For it is less than one by concavity. Thus coefficients based solely on mean viscous dissipation cannot be universal under arbitrary integral-scale intermittency. The common inertial interval can be maintained by taking both local Reynolds numbers sufficiently large.
At the ratio is exactly one. This exception is consistent with the signed third-order energy-flux law and must not be used to rescue universality of all other orders. For noninteger orders one uses absolute increments; the even-order examples already establish the counterexample without a sign convention ambiguity. The issue is the difference between a moment of the local viscous dissipation and the same power of its mean, not a failure of averaging itself.
New to topics? Read the docs here!