Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/ii/paper-2/11b/solution

For , expand . Absolute convergence of the integrated series follows from the same expression with in place of . Integrating termwise and substituting gives
This proves the Mellin transform representation of the Riemann zeta function.
Take the Hankel contour along the lower side of the negative axis towards zero, around zero counterclockwise, and back along the upper side. For the small-circle contribution tends to zero. On the lower and upper rays, respectively, , so the two integrals combine to
The gamma reflection formula now proves agreement of the two representations. At an integer , the contour integral has a zero while has a pole: their product is interpreted by its finite limit, equal to , not by multiplying literal zero and infinity.
For nonpositive integers the integrand is single-valued, and the contour closes around zero. Since
the residue of is , giving . Also
is odd. Its Laurent series therefore has only odd powers. Multiplication by cannot produce a term, and the subtracted constant cannot do so when . Hence the contour integral vanishes and for every positive integer .

New to topics? Read the docs here!