Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/iii/paper-23/3/d/solution

Suppose and are model companions of . Their universal consequences of a theory agree, so the diagram embedding criterion for universal theories permits embeddings in both directions between their model classes.
Starting from any , alternately take such extensions, identifying each model with its image under the embedding:
Since is model-complete, ; since is model-complete, . The two subsequences have the same union . The elementary chain theorem gives
Every axiom of , as a sentence true in , is therefore true in . Thus every model of is a model of . Reversing their roles proves the converse. The model companion is unique up to logical equivalence. If is inconsistent, its only possible companion is likewise inconsistent, so the same uniqueness conclusion holds.

New to topics? Read the docs here!