Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/ii/paper-4/22f/iv/solution

The implication is true in every dimension despite the failure of part (iii). The hypothesis gives , since its weight is at least one. Let be its inverse Fourier-Plancherel transform; then by construction.
Use the Gaussian approximate identity . Its Fourier transform is . Fourier inversion of this integrable multiplier times the bounded transform of , justified by Fubini, gives the same function both as and as . The first converges to in , while the second converges to in by Plancherel and dominated convergence. Along a common sequence, select subsequences converging almost everywhere for both norms. Their limits agree, giving almost everywhere. Consequently
This proves the requested conclusion without relying on the incorrect general-dimensional kernel assertion.

New to topics? Read the docs here!