Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-107/1/a/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 107 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Assume real bounded coefficients, with a principal part defining a uniformly elliptic operator, say for some , and assume . No smoothness of the boundary is needed for this classical weak maximum principle for elliptic operators. Its conclusion isIf , the zero may be omitted. Only the symmetric part of the principal coefficients contributes to the Hessian matrix contraction.
For a strict inequality , a positive interior maximum is impossible: there , is negative semidefinite, and , so . To reduce the non-strict case to this one, let . Boundedness of permits choosing so large thatThus . The preceding maximum argument and continuity on the compact closure giveLet ; the exponential is bounded on the bounded domain. This is the exponential perturbation proof of the weak maximum principle with drift, with the zeroth-order term included. For , any interior maximum, of either sign, is impossible for the perturbed function, giving the sharper boundary bound. The sign restriction on is essential: a positive first Dirichlet Laplacian eigenfunction violates the conclusion for .
New to topics? Read the docs here!