 Solution

Increasing exposure reduces fractional photon shot noise as $T^{-1/2}$, but a fixed background mismatch grows in proportion to the signal. The fractional systematic error is $|1-f|R_B/R_Q$, independent of exposure. The systematic-error signal-to-noise ceiling can therefore be poor for a faint source in a bright sky even when random fluctuations are tiny.

Better background subtraction requires matching sky location and time, correcting detector response, dithering or modelling spatial background variations. If $f$ were known exactly, one could instead use $X-Y/f$, which is unbiased and has variance $Q+B+B/f$. The ceiling arises from an uncorrected or unknown mismatch in the prescribed subtraction, not an unavoidable property of measuring two patches.

To reach an accuracy ratio $Z_{\ast }$ at all, a necessary condition in the fixed-mismatch model isEquality allows only an asymptotic approach; finite exposure adds positive random error. More exposure improves precision, but only better calibration removes the fixed background bias.