Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-year-1-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/paper-1/18/c/solution

Let and work where both and are nonzero, so the required inverse partial derivatives exist. At fixed , the total differential gives , hence . At fixed , . Their product with is : this is the cyclic partial derivative identity.
For explicit verification in this example, put and . Direct differentiation gives
Therefore
The identity is local to regular branches: for these explicit formulas require . At singular points one cannot justify cancellation of nonexistent inverse derivatives merely by writing a formal product.

New to topics? Read the docs here!