Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-methods-of-applied-functional-analysis-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2010/b/6/c/ii/solution
Past exam of the methods of applied functional analysis course of the University of Oxford 2010 B 6 c ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
In dimension one, the Sobolev embedding theorem gives . Thereforeand, for fixed ,Hence the operator is well-defined and monotone in one dimension.
In every dimension it is not well-defined on all of . We exhibit for which the purported pairing is infinite. Choose a ball compactly contained in , put , and multiply each following radial expression by a smooth cutoff function that equals one near .
For , take on a sufficiently small ball. With , the gradient integral is proportional to , while the weighted integral is proportional to . Its integral is finite because the area factor contributes exponential decay in . These singular functions have the indicated weak derivatives; deleting a small central ball and passing to the limit in integration by parts leaves no boundary term.
Thus need not be integrable in dimensions at least two. This is the squared Sobolev gradient counterexample. With the additional restriction , the form is well-defined and monotone in any dimension.
New to topics? Read the docs here!