Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-options-ii-for-mathematics-and-philosophy-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2013/e3/b/i/solution

Let . Each has finite support, and in the supremum norm metric it converges to , because .
The limit is bounded but does not have finite support. Thus the finite-support subspace is not closed in , and by part (a)(iii) it is not complete. Equivalently, the displayed sequence is Cauchy in that subspace but has no limit there.

New to topics? Read the docs here!