Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-partial-differential-equations-for-pure-and-applied-mathematicians-and-calculus-of-variations-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2008/a/2/solution

Choose a smooth compactly supported mollifier of integral one. On every compact subset of , and for sufficiently small , each translated mollifier is an allowed test, so the assumption gives . The standard mollifier approximation theorem gives in local . Thus almost everywhere.
For a multi-index , the weak derivative is the locally integrable function satisfying
Two such functions have zero pairing difference against every test, so the first result proves uniqueness. A compactly supported smooth test on an open subset extends by zero to one on , proving restriction of the derivative to .
Put . For every test the defining identity applied to gives
Thus these two distributions are identical; one is represented by a locally integrable function if and only if the other is. Their weak derivatives then agree, proving with exactly the asserted existence equivalence.
On the displayed piecewise affine function is continuous at one. Integration by parts separately on the two intervals shows its first weak derivative is one on and minus one on ; the first boundary terms cancel by continuity. The derivative of that step function is . This distribution is not represented by a locally integrable function: tests of height one supported in shrinking neighborhoods of one have pairing with it, whereas their integrals against any fixed local function tend to zero. Hence there is a first weak derivative but no locally integrable second weak derivative.

New to topics? Read the docs here!