 Solution

In a simple metal, conduction Electrons can move collectively in response to an incident electromagnetic wave. The Drude model gives, with time dependence $e^{-i\omega t}$,In the low-loss range $\gamma \ll \omega <{\omega }_p$, the relative permittivity is approximately $1-{\omega }_p^2/{\omega }^2<0$. The wavevector inside is predominantly imaginary, so the field is evanescent and penetrates only a short distance. Surface currents reradiate the field; little energy enters a good conductor. The normal-incidence Fresnel equations giveMany ordinary metals have their plasma frequency in the ultraviolet, placing visible light below this reflection edge. For $\omega >{\omega }_p$ the free-carrier contribution permits propagation; at $\omega \gg {\omega }_p$, ${ϵ}_r\to 1$ and $R\sim {\omega }_p^4/(16{\omega }^4)\to 0$. The electrons' inertial response becomes too small to screen the rapidly oscillating field.

Ultraviolet transparency is a simple-metal model prediction, not a universal property of real metals. Electronic transitions between bands and bound-electron absorption can remain strong, shift the plasma edge and prevent transparency; transmission also depends on thickness and attenuation. The robust explanation is the change from a reflective negative-permittivity range to a possible propagating range above the plasma edge.