Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-theoretical-physics-i-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/paper-1/2/e/solution

Take the stated negligible-natural-radius limit as , with both initial velocities zero at . Then . Write and , where . At two radial turning points , equality of the effective radial energies gives
Using gives, for and ,
The minimum is a regular radial turning point, so
The angular velocity has the sign of . On the initial inward motion, conservation of canonical angular momentum produces the rotation needed to prevent collapse to zero radius.
The strictly zero-field case is singular for this angular formula: and the ring instead collapses to with inward radial speed in the ideal radial equation, where an angular coordinate ceases to describe a ring. The limit through nonzero fields gives a tiny positive turning radius with large angular velocity, and must not be substituted into the formula at exactly zero field. A small nonzero also matters if the predicted minimum becomes comparable with it.

New to topics? Read the docs here!